← Search

Dana Anderson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clarkesville, GA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 51W–88L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history139 matches
L
2026-10-16 · Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Hite
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-09 · Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Mayhew
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-02 · Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Turner
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-25 · Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Thomson
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-06 · Cherokee Bluff (Renee Bullard)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Vaughan
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-04 · Cherokee Bluff (Renee Bullard)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Vaughan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-02-16 · Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Mayhew
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-28 · Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Werren
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-02 · Chateau Elan (Bonnie Sikorski)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Creighton
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-12-12 · Chateau Elan (Bonnie Sikorski)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Sikorski
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-12-05 · Chateau Elan (Bonnie Sikorski)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Sikorski
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2023-11-28 · Chateau Elan (Bonnie Sikorski)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Creighton
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.4% of games
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
41.6%
47W–66L · 47.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–8L · 33.5% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams