← Search

William Baldwin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oakwood, OH
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 53W–25L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history78 matches
W
2026-07-11 · QRRC-Madoffori · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Broerman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · QRRC-Madoffori · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Ulery
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · QRRC-Madoffori · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ritze
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-19 · QRRC Madoffori · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ritze
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-06-07 · QRRC Madoffori · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Ulery
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-07-20 · QRRC Madoffori · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Huston
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-13 · QRRC Madoffori · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ritze
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-29 · QRRC Madoffori · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clayton Burkle
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-06-01 · QRRC Madoffori · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Ulery
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-25 · QRRC Madoffori · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Haines
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-04-28 · QRRC-Aguilera · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roy Stevens
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-17 · QRRC-Aguilera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Jefferson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
77.8%
35W–10L · 60.1% of games
4.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.8% of games
7.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer