← Search

Myra Marsh

— year-end
159 matches · 92W–67L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Myra Marsh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
L
2026-05-11 · Marsh · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Manuel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · Marsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Pfluger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brigitte Coker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brigitte Coker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
Cindy Byrd / Leslie Jackson
2026-03-30 · Marsh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Swartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-23 · Marsh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Redden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracy Tatum-Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Trisha Corbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-03-09 · Pfluger/Swartz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Hallmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-02 · Pfluger/Swartz · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Redden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Laura Abilez / Christy Ross
2026-02-23 · Pfluger/Swartz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Redden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-02-16 · Pfluger/Swartz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Tomerlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
53.6%
37W–32L · 53.5% of games
4.0
58.7%
27W–19L · 54.8% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 57.1% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 61.4% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 60.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
21 matches
#1 Singles
11%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer