← Search

Nancy Whitmar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fulton, MO
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
28 matches · 10W–18L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history28 matches
L
2025-06-02 · Jane Boles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Schaal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-05 · Jane Boles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynelle Phillips
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2023-04-05 · Serve Me Wine · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Hoffmann
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-10-03 · Donna's Team · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Ochoa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-09-29 · Donna's Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wesselman Mark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2022-09-19 · Donna's Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wesselman Mark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-09-12 · Donna's Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wesselman Mark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-07-09 · Laurie's Team · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhoda Ponzer
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2022-05-07 · Laurie's Team · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhoda Ponzer
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2021-11-28 · Rhoads/Woods (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Briggs
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2021-11-14 · Rhoads/Woods (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Edwards
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2021-11-07 · Rhoads/Woods (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marianna Hopson
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
45%
9W–11L · 46.1% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 31.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 68% of the time
#2 Doubles
68%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams