← Search

Heather Schollmeier

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 35W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history68 matches
L
2026-10-16 · Indy CX 6.5 IRCD Jackson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anthony Gulley mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 6.5 IRCD Jackson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anthony Gulley mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · Indy X40 7.0 IRCD Jackson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Jackson mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-27 · Indy X40 7.0 IRCD Jackson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Seipel mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-13 · Indy X18 7.0 IRCD Jackson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Jackson mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-21 · CIN CX 6.5 IRCD Jackson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bob Slowikowski mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-11-07 · CIN CX 6.5 IRCD Jackson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anthony Gulley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-19 · CIN CX 6.5 IRCD Jackson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anthony Gulley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2023-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Belinda Strobel
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2023-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Belinda Strobel
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-01-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Belinda Strobel
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Belinda Strobel
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 53.9% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.9% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
39.3%
11W–17L · 49.4% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe