Dana Johnson
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stonington, CT
132 matches · 85W–47L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history132 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2027
LS: Set 2 win!: Burlingham
LS: Set 2 win!: Burlingham/Hurtt
MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan
MIS: Mystical: Johnson/Rennie
LS: C Squared: Conway
LS:Set 2 Win!:Burlingham
MIS: Cosgriff/Nolan
MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan
MIS: Mixed 40 and Over 7.0:Abate
MIS:Cosgriff 3.5:Cosgriff
MIS:Mighty Mystics:Frickman/Steppan
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.1% of games
3.5
71.8%
28W–11L · 61.2% of games
4.0
41.9%
13W–18L · 47.7% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
32W–12L · 56.1% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
26 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.