← Search

Lori Tanking

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indian Wells, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 70W–78L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history148 matches
W
2026-11-01 · CV-Mission Hills/Tennyson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Holmsten
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-25 · CV-Mission Hills/Tennyson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Scullion
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Hendrickson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · CV-LLW-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L Gagnon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaprece Walker championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-15 · CV-LLW-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L Gagnon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Holmsten championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-15 · CV-LLW-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L Gagnon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaprece Walker championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Christ mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-28 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randall Kaump mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-30 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Jones & Roughan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Olga Ruiz
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-28 · CV-LLW-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L Gagnon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Roughan
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-26 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Jones & Roughan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Jones
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-21 · CV-LLW-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L Gagnon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Roughan
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
48.9%
46W–48L · 49.2% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.8% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.3% of games
6.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.5% of games
7.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 45.6% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal