← Search

ADRA KIPPER

Caldwell, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
148 matches · 45W–103L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.88
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
93%
stay 3.0
7%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.83. Lower than today’s 2.88 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
ID · 3.0
163 of 240
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
ADRA is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

ADRA has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, ADRA has gone from the 15th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 53.6% of games
3.5
15.5%
9W–49L · 36.7% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.2% of games
6.5mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
39.4%
13W–20L · 44.4% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 34.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history148 matches
L
Amy Lapp / Lori Tapanilamixedchamps
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Ellen German
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-7
L
Megan Parrish / Vasey Stephens
2026-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Moore
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-0
W
Trevi Hardy / Suzanne Hickok
2026-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Yost
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 7-5
W
Taylor Barton / Lucy Streeby
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Friend
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
L
River Armstrong / Jennifer Hemly
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Yost
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Lynda Brown / Lori Greer
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Yost
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-3
L
Teresa Giamportone / Kari Majors
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Yost
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-3
L
Jacqueline Lawley / Tannan Koehl
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Hickok
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
L
Sherri Matney / Lori Barnum
2026-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Friend
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cameron Schultz
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Hickok
+0.011about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Simhachalam Pilla / Julie Eiselemixed
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Kopplin
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.