← Search

QUEEN HARGROVE

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
317 matches · 107W–210L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history317 matches
L
2026-07-18 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-11 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Krzeszewski
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Kethey
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Patton
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · Pa.Hankerson18A3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · Pa.Hankerson18A3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · Ja.Bolton-Cubillan18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Kethey
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · Pa.Hankerson18A3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 35.5% of games
3.5
43.2%
60W–79L · 48.1% of games
4.0
25.9%
14W–40L · 42.1% of games
6.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 56.4% of games
7.5
14.3%
4W–24L · 37.6% of games
8.5
6.5%
2W–29L · 24.6% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
116 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
99 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
70 matches
#3 Singles
5%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
7 matches
Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe