← Search

Danielle Cawood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Park Ridge, NJ
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 45W–42L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history87 matches
L
2026-08-15 · Northern: Falcone · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · Northern: Falcone · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Pinheiro championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-14 · Northern: Falcone · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Pinheiro championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · Northern: Falcone · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Choi
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Choi championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Northern: Falcone · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Choi
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · MH:Total Tennis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cawood mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · Southern: WTLOV · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Choi
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-02-01 · Southern: WTLOV · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Bamford
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-24 · MH:Total Tennis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cawood mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-11-16 · MH:Total Tennis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cawood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · MH:Total Tennis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cawood mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.4% of games
4.0
50%
25W–25L · 49.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.5% of games
7.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 59.9% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Singles
18%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#2 Singles
13%
11 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova