← Search

Melanie Seger

— year-end
23 matches · 14W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Melanie Seger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-04-10 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-27 · RTC CURTIS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-27 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-20 · RTC CURTIS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Soana Moores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Denise Daniel / Tammy Harris
2026-02-13 · BIR PINE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Daly / Deanna Williams
2026-02-03 · BIR PINE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-01-16 · BIR PINE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-10 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-26 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Deanna Williams / Elizabeth Daly
2025-09-12 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-18 · RTC CURTIS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Ducanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
60%
12W–8L · 53.8% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert