← Search

Peter Sullivan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Orinda, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
305 matches · 185W–120L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history305 matches
W
2026-11-01 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jessica Datte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-19 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jessica Datte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammie Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-10-07 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammie Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-05 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jessica Datte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-04 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Julia Overs Bates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-27 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Julia Overs Bates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammie Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leone Patterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammie Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jessica Datte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-15 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 18AM4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mateus Fiamenghi championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
66.4%
97W–49L · 56.1% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games
8.5
58.3%
21W–15L · 52.3% of games
9.0
46.7%
14W–16L · 52% of games
9.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.7% of games
9.0mixed
56.5%
35W–27L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
94 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
77 matches
#1 Singles
11%
32 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams