← Search

Stacy Barnett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHATHAM, MA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 5W–14L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history19 matches
L
2026-02-05 · MCAC:Titans:Felix:Hayes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcela Hayes
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-5
W
2026-01-08 · MCAC:Titans:Felix:Hayes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allyson Felix
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-07 · MCAC:Felix:Felix/Mosca · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Marie Hodgson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-29 · MCAC:Felix:Felix/Mosca · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Benoit
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-5
L
2024-02-15 · MCAC:Felix:Felix/Mosca · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Marie Hodgson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-5, 0-1
L
2024-02-08 · MCAC:Felix:Felix/Mosca · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deanna Waldron
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-4
L
2024-01-25 · MCAC:Felix:Felix/Mosca · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorie Gochenour
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-5
L
2024-01-18 · MCAC:Felix:Felix/Mosca · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Wilson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-5
L
2024-01-04 · MCAC:Felix:Felix/Mosca · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorie Gochenour
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-12-14 · MCAC:Felix:Felix/Mosca · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorie Gochenour
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-10-26 · MCAC:Felix:Felix/Mosca · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Swartz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-5
W
2022-03-06 · MCAC:Scopeletis:Scopeleis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lincoln Passmore mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 40.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
47%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal