← Search

Scott Bedgood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MACON, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
351 matches · 182W–169L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history351 matches
L
2026-10-26 · RN - Smith 4.0 40+ Fall · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Dudas
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-22 · RN - Smith 4.0 18+ Fall · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pat Patton
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-19 · RN - Smith 4.0 40+ Fall · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mell Merritt
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-12 · RN - Smith 4.0 40+ Fall · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Bergl
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-01 · RN - Smith 4.0 18+ Fall · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Bergl
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-21 · RN - Smith 4.0 40+ Fall · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mell Merritt
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-14 · RN - Smith 4.0 40+ Fall · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Matson
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Dailey mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Rubanov mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Dailey mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · RN - Smith 4.0 18+ Fall · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pat Patton
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · MATA/Todd Smith · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Byrd
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 53.2% of games
4.0
53.3%
113W–99L · 51.4% of games
7.5
50%
18W–18L · 53.3% of games
8.0
42.6%
26W–35L · 46.9% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
122 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
119 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
68 matches
Singles
5%
18 matches
#2 Singles
3%
12 matches
#1 Singles
3%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer