← Search

Claire Hallock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
5.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 30W–13L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history43 matches
W
2026-10-29 · Crazy Aces · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Patrick Brick mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-14 · Feldman - Aces & Kings · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Matthew Geppi mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-06 · Feldman - Aces & Kings · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Leonard Tetteh mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · All Gas No Brakes · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Grant Chambers mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · All Gas No Brakes · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Grant Chambers mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · All Gas No Brakes · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Manuel Orta mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Manuel Orta mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Manuel Orta mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-06-17 · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2024-05-11 · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Marc Nichols mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
Theresa Torelli / Erin Gebes
2024-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kristen Remeza
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 63.7% of games
10.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 55% of games
5.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61% of games
9.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 33% of the time
Singles
33%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
12%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe