← Search

Kacey Kopley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waxhaw, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 84W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history168 matches
W
2026-09-25 · LPowell/HJohnson (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Crawford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-21 · DGreenaway/HJohnson (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Danguy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-14 · DGreenaway/HJohnson (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lea Powell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · DGreenaway/HJohnson (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna McLaughlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-28 · LPowell/HJohnson (Life Time) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Pacello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · DGreenaway/HJohnson (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dawn Greenaway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-21 · LPowell/HJohnson (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Crawford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-09-22 · MCrawford/MEccleston (Lifetime) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leezah Pratt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-09-19 · LPowell/HJohnson (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leezah Pratt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-09-15 · OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Malone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-12 · OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leidys Pinzon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-09-08 · MCrawford/MEccleston (Lifetime) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leezah Pratt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
3.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 58.1% of games
4.0
20.4%
11W–43L · 38.6% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.2% of games
7.5
66%
35W–18L · 52.2% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer