← Search

Jessica Walker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 78W–58L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history136 matches
L
2026-10-08 · ASpanjers/JWalker (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sophie Pollak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-02 · AConger/DConrad (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelley Brunker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-25 · SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Schmitt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · AConger/DConrad (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Smulktis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-11 · SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicki Spang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · ASpanjers/JWalker (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Bass
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · ASpanjers/JWalker (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · SAbbott/ASpanjers (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha Abbott
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-03 · SAbbott/ASpanjers (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hillary Crittendon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-05 · SAbbott/ASpanjers (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha Abbott
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-04-27 · ASpanjers/EBass (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Abbott
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · LGrant/MKleber (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Abrams
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 55.4% of games
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 58.7% of games
3.5
50%
13W–13L · 48.2% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.3% of games
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 55% of games
6.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 54.7% of games
7.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.9% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal