← Search

Laura Hodges

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Belden, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 54W–54L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history108 matches
L
2026-10-04 · Parker Spees TCC Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Reed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-01 · Parker Spees TCC Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Decker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-01 · Parker Spees TCC Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Beasley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Burk 3.5W 40+ TCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Averette championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · Burk 3.5W 40+ TCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arian Waldrop championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · Burk 3.5W 40+ TCC · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-19 · Burk 3.5W 40+ TCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Burk championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-05 · Burk 3.5W 40+ TCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Edwards
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-15 · Burk 3.5W 40+ TCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-18 · Duke · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Suzanne Cervantes
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-17 · Rebekah Wiseman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Damon Ladner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-07-16 · Duke · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Suzanne Cervantes
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.8% of games
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 64.2% of games
3.5
28%
7W–18L · 39.8% of games
5.5
25%
2W–6L · 38.2% of games
6.5
50%
8W–8L · 50.2% of games
3.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.8% of games
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#1 Singles
22%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert