← Search

Parmvir Singh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
GAITHERSBURG, MD
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
333 matches · 218W–115L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history333 matches
L
2026-10-14 · Juh - New Wave · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zheng Dong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-11 · Hamawy - BigRacquet · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Thomsen
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-06 · Hamawy - BigRacquet · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Baumann
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-05 · Juh - New Wave · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tana Jankowiak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-01 · Hamawy - BigRacquet · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dmitri Blumin
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-29 · Juh - New Wave · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shan Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yaru Song mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie McIntyre mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-20 · Anderson & Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Hughes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-4
W
2026-08-23 · Nguyen Some-Get Some · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sanghee Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Nguyen Some-Get Some · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gita Timmerman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · Nguyen Some-Get Some · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sanghee Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams104 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 51.4% of games
3.5
47.2%
17W–19L · 47.5% of games
4.0
39%
16W–25L · 42.3% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
12W–4L · 64.6% of games
7.5
63%
17W–10L · 54.6% of games
0.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 43.8% of games
3.5mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 64.7% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
87%
20W–3L · 67.1% of games
6.5mixed
100%
9W–0L · 67.3% of games
7.0mixed
79.4%
81W–21L · 62.9% of games
7.5mixed
69.7%
23W–10L · 58.5% of games
8.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
100 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
93 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams