← Search

Megan Ramous

Reno, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
134 matches · 84W–50L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.00
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
49%
stay 3.0
51%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 84% stay · 16% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.92. Lower than today’s 3.00 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 3.0
59 of 166

Megan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Megan has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Megan has gone from the 9th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
71.1%
54W–22L · 58.3% of games
3.5
51.6%
16W–15L · 46.9% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 52.9% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.3% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history134 matches
W
Keri Baer / Kelley King
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Gurnea
+0.035better than expected — took 58% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lauren Jackson / Joy Fanien
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachael Hueftle
+0.042better than expected — took 60% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Candace Fair / Sue Barton
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Maguire
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Miriam DeQuadros / Mallory Snyder
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Taber
−0.025below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Cathy Powell / Samantha Stith-Rodriguez
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Herzberg
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Susan Lewis / Bridget Matos
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tamara Taber
+0.043better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Vicky Cain / Cynthia Marment
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Bodfish
−0.027below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Candace Fair / Cathy Powell
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Maguire
+0.031better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Anne Ambrose / Donnelyn Curtis
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thoann Ngo
+0.054better than expected — took 62% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Tania Kellermeyer / Millie Mitchell
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Walter
−0.011about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Kim Watson / Alan Lawrencemixedchamps
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · with Nicholas Kane
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Michelle Nowicki / Erik Gillmixed
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Austin Lee
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.