← Search

Pamela Hjelle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sandy Spring, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 50W–31L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history81 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Hjelle - Norbeck Netters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Hockey
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · Hjelle - Norbeck Netters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Nowack
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · Hjelle - Norbeck Netters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Vilardo
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-6
L
2026-07-27 · Hjelle - Norbeck Netters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with KATIE KELLY
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
Default
2026-06-22 · Hjelle - Norbeck Netters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Schaffer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-09 · World Tennis Club / Calkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne Blum
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-12-15 · Ialeggio - Edge Plus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Hockey
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-12-08 · Ialeggio - Edge Plus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raina Fishbane
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-18 · Ialeggio - Edge Plus · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Dubrow
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-10 · Ialeggio - Edge Plus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Merril
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-10-28 · Ialeggio - Edge Plus · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheng Hoon Lim
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-20 · Ialeggio - Edge Plus · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Hockey
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
74.3%
26W–9L · 61.4% of games
4.0
51.1%
23W–22L · 53.9% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova