← Search

Celia Wood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
OXFORD, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 63W–57L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history120 matches
L
2026-09-27 · Gaines- NC -Cc Oxford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Priscilla Hawkins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-24 · Gaines- NC -Cc Oxford · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Willoughby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · Campbell- NC- Oxford · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Cooley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-30 · Gaines- NC -Cc Oxford · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Frazer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Gaines- NC -Cc Oxford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Baker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Gaines - NC - CC Oxford · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blakeney Black
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
Default
2026-07-21 · Powell- 4.0- Oxford · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Jolly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · Gaines - NC - CC Oxford · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hallie Beasley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · Gaines - NC - CC Oxford · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Catherine Boudreaux
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · Gaines - NC - CC Oxford · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Buchanan
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Powell- 4.0- Oxford · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Jolly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle McAuley championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.5% of games
3.0
75%
12W–4L · 58.3% of games
3.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 50% of games
4.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 36.8% of games
6.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.9% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.6% of games
4.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 27.7% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#1 Singles
9%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer