← Search

Mark Lovett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 18W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history45 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Hempfield Fire and Salt - Saltzer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Carreras
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Hempfield Fire and Salt - Saltzer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Beeler
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Hempfield Fire and Salt - Saltzer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Horetsky
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · Hempfield Fire and Salt - Saltzer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kris Geller
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Hempfield Fire and Salt - Saltzer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregory de Vitry
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-07-12 · Hempfield- Fire Baum · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Rodgers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-06-30 · Hempfield- Fire Baum · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Rodgers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-06-24 · Hempfield- Fire Baum · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kosta Kontanis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-19 · Hempfield- Fire Baum · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kosta Kontanis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-12 · Hempfield- Fire Baum · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Rodgers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-05 · Hempfield- Fire Baum · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kosta Kontanis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-16 · Hempfield-Fire Baum (Baumer) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregory de Vitry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–6L · 33.6% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 47.5% of games
6.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 49.5% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova