← Search

Michael Bzdak

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
High Bridge, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 40W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history124 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Match Point Masters · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Archana Prasad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-04 · Match Point Masters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Bzdak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · Mishits · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Moser
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · Mishits · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Darienzo
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · Mishits · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Darienzo
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · The Rat Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Bzdak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · The Rat Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Bzdak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-22 · The Rat Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Bzdak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · The Rat Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Bzdak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-07 · The Rat Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Bzdak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-24 · The Rat Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Bzdak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-09-21 · NJD/van Mol/Nagel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mohammed Moamen championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
45%
9W–11L · 44.6% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
33.3%
12W–24L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
27.1%
16W–43L · 39.9% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 41.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe