← Search

Douglas Adams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Quinta, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 8W–8L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history16 matches
L
2024-03-21 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/B Smith & J Bauersfield · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Cross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-02-21 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/B Smith & J Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Cross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-02-15 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/B Smith & J Bauersfield · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Cross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-01-11 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/B Smith & J Bauersfield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Cross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
2022-03-03 · LLW-CV-Indian Ridge/Smith & Bauersfield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Cross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-02-10 · LLW-CV-Indian Ridge/Smith & Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-02-03 · LLW-CV-Indian Ridge/Smith & Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Len Ames
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2022-01-27 · LLW-CV-Indian Ridge/Smith & Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Bauersfeld
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2022-01-13 · LLW-CV-Indian Ridge/Smith & Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Bauersfeld
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-01-06 · LLW-CV-Indian Ridge/Smith & Bauersfield · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Cross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2020-02-10 · CV-Woodhaven/J Thompson & Daggett · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dwight Muhlbradt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2020-02-03 · CV-Woodhaven/J Thompson & Daggett · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Cross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 56.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer