Search

BC LeDoux

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
135 matches · 57W–78L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
29 of 129
NV · 4.0
42 of 203

BC is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

BC has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, BC has gone from the 32nd to the 84th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
61.8%
34W–21L · 55% of games
4.5
28.3%
17W–43L · 42.2% of games
5.0
0%
0W–5L · 29.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history135 matches
L
David Truongchamps
2026-06-16 · #2 Singles
0.091below expectation — took 37% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Riley Stahley / Adam Gratz
2026-05-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Clingo
+0.044better than expected — took 53% of games against 35% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Alan Mcgrath
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.009about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Luis Almanzar
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.013about as expected — took 57% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Louis Lo
2026-05-04 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.083better than expected — took 100% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Michael Lwin / Tyler Gaston
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Burgoyne
0.023below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
David Velazquez Bazan
2026-04-18 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.016better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Patrick Cronin
2026-04-11 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.019better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Mark Norman / Michael de Amicis
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cody Kennedy
0.013below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-08 · #1 Singles
0.001about as expected — took 46% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Jose Guerrero
2026-03-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.040below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.