← Search

Samantha Schneider

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Huntersville, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 56W–108L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history164 matches
W
2026-10-01 · LSAR-Armstrong/Jetton · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leah Terry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-15 · LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Phillips
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-10 · LSAR-Armstrong/Jetton · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Nance
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Crane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-23 · LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Frisch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-18 · LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Frame
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · LSAR-Armstrong/Jetton · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Armstrong
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-03 · MLSCU-Cune-Yin/ 40+MIXED DrINKS 3.5 Mon pm · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Schneider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · TLJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Napier
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · TLSVA-Vaughn/Jetton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martine Maness
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · MLSCU-Cune-Yin/ 40+MIXED DrINKS 3.5 Mon pm · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Schneider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · TLSVA-Vaughn/Jetton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Watson
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 46.3% of games
3.0
29%
20W–49L · 42.1% of games
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 32% of games
5.5
50%
14W–14L · 51.8% of games
6.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 40.3% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 32.4% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 29.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert