← Search

Matthew Sugarman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Atlanta, GA
3.0M year-end 2024
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
23 matches · 10W–13L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history23 matches
L
2026-10-02 · Sugar Creek (Ladonna Cox)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gayle Weaks mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-25 · Sugar Creek (Ladonna Cox)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ladonna Cox mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Griffin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
Camden Costa / Rachel Drucker
2024-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Griffin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
Samir Salihbegovic / Katie Bruckner
2024-03-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janelle Blasingame mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
Trevor Shepard / Yvonne Pearson
2024-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Trent mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
Philip Davis / Lauren Gilkenson
2023-10-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Trent mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-09-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Terrell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2023-04-14 · Sugar Creek (Arlene Reese)* · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Griffin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-03-22 · Sugar Creek (Arlene Reese)* · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Griffin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2020-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marjorie Crowal mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2019-10-25 · Sugar Creek (Matthew Sugarman)* · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gloria Byrd mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 61.1% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams