← Search

Douglas Fish

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walnut Creek, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 64W–99L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history163 matches
L
2026-10-31 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Pruden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-24 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Belinda Castillo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-17 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Caruso mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-10 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Pruden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-08 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5B · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Glenn Mcbee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-06 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5B · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dan Kwan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-10-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Girish Badola
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-22 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5B · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ethan Voskoboynik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irina Chase mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Holcenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-05 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Holcenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
35.6%
21W–38L · 43.5% of games
6.5
19%
4W–17L · 38.4% of games
7.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 42.8% of games
6.0mixed
52.6%
20W–18L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams