← Search

Paige Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
51 matches · 30W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history51 matches
L
2026-10-01 · Goekeler/LF/40&over3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margot Heyne-Bell
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-08 · Goekeler/LF/40&over3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tressa Nunley
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · Killingsworth/LF 55s 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Roberson
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · Killingsworth/LF 55s 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Roberson
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · Killingsworth/LF 55s 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Goekeler
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2025-05-10 · Killingsworth/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tricia Riggs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-12 · Killingsworth/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brenda Lewis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2022-04-12 · Nix/LF · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Nix
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2022-03-16 · OK/Sacra/55&over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rochelle Cordray
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-03-03 · Nix/LF · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Nix
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2021-06-23 · McKillip/LF · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Burdick
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2021-05-11 · McKillip/LF · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Noreen Peters
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.1% of games
3.0
58.6%
17W–12L · 52.5% of games
6.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer