← Search

Virginia Pettigrew

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Easley, SC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 16W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history42 matches
L
2025-11-14 · UPTA18FF/Howard/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blake Brookshire
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-07 · UPTA18FF/Howard/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blake Brookshire
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-24 · UPTA18FF/Howard/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Miller Howard
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-10-17 · UPTA18FF/Howard/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Liz Faucher
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-03 · UPTA18FF/Howard/Kroc · #1 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-18 · UPTA18A/Howard/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blake Brookshire
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-04 · UPTA18A/Howard/Kroc · #1 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-03-28 · UPTA18A/Howard/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blake Brookshire
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-14 · UPTA18A/Howard/Kroc · #1 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-03-07 · UPTA18A/Howard/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Duff Rayneri
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-07-11 · UPTA55M/Maxey/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Shirley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-20 · UPTA55M/Maxey/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Maxey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.4% of games
3.0
25%
2W–6L · 39.4% of games
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#1 Singles
19%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer