Search

Emily Rounsley

Ashburn, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
36 matches · 17W–19L · seasons 20192025
Where Emily sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Emily is one of 423 women at 4.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.5 account for 98% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Mixologists
2025 Washington D.c. Mixed 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Mixed 18 & Over 9.0
2025
Team 5 Grace's Aces
2025 Nova Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0
2025
Team 4 Grace's Aces
2025 Nova Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0
2025
Team 9 Grace's Aces
2025 Nova Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women
2025
Team 4 Grace's Aces
2025 Nova Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women
2025
Ball too Well
2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.54.04.5201920242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Emily has gone from the 20th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 68% of games
4.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 48% of games
4.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history36 matches
W
Julie Seraphinmixedchamps
2025-07-11 · #1 Singles
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Meredith Whitemixedchamps
2025-07-11 · #1 Singles
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Greta Davies / Gillian Lee
2025-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mia Kim
0.009about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
6-7, 4-2
W
N/A
2025-06-01 · #2 Singles · 4.5
0.083about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Betsy Johnston / Julia Faustman
2025-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mia Kim
+0.015better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Andrea Moore
2025-05-18 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.020better than expected — took 92% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Kathleen Kane / Blanca Shumann
2025-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Crystal Cornell
+0.052better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Tanya Grover
2025-04-22 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.072below expectation — took 43% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 2-2
L
Chip Hathaway / Andrea Gevasmixed
2025-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brandon Kondis
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 4-4
L
David Todd / Ruya Kormixed
2025-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rohan Wadehra
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Christopher Beausoleil / Erin Davismixed
2025-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barrett Redington
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Leila Lam / Zackery Gouldmixed
2025-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with RICARDO DURAN
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.