← Search

Richard Hall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baldwinsville, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 49W–62L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history111 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-24 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with David Ng
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-08 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Kevin Hunt
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-21 · Sorry Not Sorry · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Meade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · Sorry Not Sorry · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allyson Mead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Adam Berg / Joshua Gray
2025-12-03 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Kevin Hunt
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-25 · Krueger · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Campagna mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-01-11 · Krueger · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Campagna mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Wallenstein
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
Matthew Harvey / Evan Landy Freuder
2024-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Lee
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-23 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica Viviano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesse Daino
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Smith
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62.2%
23W–14L · 55.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 24.7% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
38.6%
17W–27L · 44.8% of games
7.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 32.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
20 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova