← Search

Roopa Gurm

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 111W–106L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history217 matches
L
2026-11-01 · VTC-Watson 7.0 X 55&0 F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Rooke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yena Kim championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · HV-King 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ned Staebler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · HV-Sober 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gillett
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · VTC-Haessler (indoor) 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hanna Song
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · HV-Watson 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Rusche-Leone
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-02 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Padma Nallamothu
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-30 · VTC-Haessler (indoor) 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Famurewa
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · AAREC-Cortina 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yena Kim
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samina Siddiqui
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · HV-Sober 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Stein
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · HV-Watson 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deana Shields
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.7% of games
3.5
57.7%
64W–47L · 54.2% of games
4.0
33.3%
14W–28L · 42.5% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 50% of games
7.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 53.8% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
44.4%
12W–15L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
23 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert