← Search

Brooke Kunkel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plymouth, MN
5.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
14 matches · 1W–13L · seasons 2018–2022
Match history14 matches
L
2022-07-24 · Kruse · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Kruse mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-07-17 · Kruse · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Kruse mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-15 · Kruse · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Kruse mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-03-20 · Kruse · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Kruse mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
L
2022-03-06 · Kruse · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hammargren mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-02-27 · Kruse · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Weinberg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-02-06 · Kruse · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brandon Valtinson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-01-16 · Kruse · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brandon Valtinson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-01-09 · Kruse · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brandon Valtinson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2019-03-15 · HANSEN 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Connell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2019-02-08 · HANSEN 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Holland mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2018-11-18 · HANSEN 9.0 ES · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alexander McLeod mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
8.0mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 35.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams