← Search

James Sadek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brooklyn, NY
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 5W–11L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history16 matches
L
2026-06-04 · Mindich · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Rudolf van Mol
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-11 · Mindich · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Rudolf van Mol
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-04 · Mindich · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Rudolf van Mol
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-10 · Mindich · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lee Nadler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-02 · Mindich · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lee Nadler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-19 · Mindich · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sameer Mithal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-05 · Mindich · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Corcoran
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2020-02-18 · Holtz/McGee · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ankur Chaturvedi
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2020-01-29 · Holtz/McGee · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ankur Chaturvedi
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2019-12-19 · Holtz/McGee · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ankur Chaturvedi
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2019-07-01 · Mindich · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lawrence Lehman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2019-04-26 · Mindich · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Legunn
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 29.2% of games
4.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.8% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe