Bettina Griehl
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madera, CA
97 matches · 47W–50L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history97 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2025
CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18MX8.0A
CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 40MX8.0A
SIERRA SPORT 55AW8.0A
CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18MX8.0A
CLOVIS NORTH HS 18MX8.0A
CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 40MX8.0A
ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.5B
CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 55AW8.0A
CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18MX8.0A
CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 40MX8.0A
CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 18AW4.5A
CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS WEST HS 18MX8.0A
SIERRA SPORT 18AW4.0A
SIERRA SPORT 40AW4.5A
SIERRA SPORT 40AW4.0A
SIERRA SPORT 55MX8.0A
CLOVIS NORTH HS 18MX7.0A
CLOVIS NORTH HS 18MX8.0A
CLOVIS NORTH HS 40MX8.0A
CLOVIS NORTH HS 55MX8.0A
CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS CW8.5A
IN SHAPE: DEMAREE VISALIA 40AW4.5+A
SIERRA SPORT 18AW4.0A
SIERRA SPORT 40AW4.0A
SIERRA SPORT CW7.5A
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.3% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.4% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.3% of games
8.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 49.6% of games
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.8% of games
8.0mixed
47.5%
19W–21L · 48.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.