← Search

Kamran Diba

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 122W–108L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history230 matches
L
2026-10-31 · FAC-Stieber 55s 7.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Piao championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-30 · FAC-Stieber 55s 7.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anthony Spagnoli championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-17 · HV-Diba 3.5M Fall Singles F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-4
L
2026-10-09 · HV-Diba 3.5M Fall Singles F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-26 · FAC-Stieber 55s 7.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Franzen championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · FAC-Stieber 55s 7.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Vondell championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · CHIP-Howard 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sean Howard championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · FAC-Stieber 55s 7.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anthony Spagnoli championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-31 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Gerlach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · CHIP-Howard 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Gajar
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · HV-Clarke 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · CHIP-Howard 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sean Howard
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
53.1%
51W–45L · 50.8% of games
4.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 47.9% of games
6.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 56.4% of games
7.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 53% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.6% of games
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.3% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 51.6% of games
7.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
39 matches
#1 Singles
8%
19 matches
#2 Singles
7%
16 matches
Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams