← Search

Rick Tao

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chesterfield, MO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 113W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history154 matches
L
2026-10-30 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Arnstein championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-30 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stan Hogrebe championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-24 · Shouldis · #1 Mixed Doubles · 9.0 · with Julia Bush mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · Tao-Maack (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Kennedy
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-11 · Tao-Maack (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Sutter
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-10-04 · Tao-Maack (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Obertop
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
Junko Oba / Ben Gildehaus
2026-10-03 · Shouldis · #1 Mixed Doubles · 9.0 · with Christina Pupillo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-09-27 · Tao-Maack (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Arceneaux
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-20 · Tao-Maack (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Randy Freeman
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
Default
2026-09-19 · Shouldis · #1 Mixed Doubles · 9.0 · with Julia Bush mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-13 · Tao-Maack (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephen Arnstein
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-30 · STL/Tao/40&Over4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Schrumpf championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.7% of games
4.5
79.6%
74W–19L · 60.4% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
47 matches
Singles
14%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
21 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert