← Search

Nancy Emma

— year-end
14 matches · 4W–10L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Nancy Emma to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
2021-04-27 · Cedarbrook Stunners · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy DiPangrazio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-04-20 · Cedarbrook Stunners · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Salvitti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2020-03-04 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2020-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2020-02-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet McCrossen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2020-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet McCrossen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2019-12-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2019-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Lehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2019-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Kimberly McDermott / Sueli Vieira
2019-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Christy Howe / Nicole Harrington
2019-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Hillary Kessler / Lisa Armellino
2019-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#1 Singles
14%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer