← Search

Brad Riley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Haverhill, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 65W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history128 matches
L
2026-10-30 · SFTNA: Spark Plugs:van Ravestyn · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Toni Cavallini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · SFTNA: Spark Plugs:van Ravestyn · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kellie VanRavestyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Shanahan championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Shanahan championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Shanahan championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-22 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Khem Veasna championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Higgins championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michel VanRavestyn
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Shanahan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Shanahan
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · SFT-A:Spark Blue Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rodolfo Pichardo
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-27 · SFTNA:Spark-NA:Over Served:van Ravestyn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Shanahan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
58.2%
39W–28L · 53.5% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 32.4% of games
6.0mixed
44%
22W–28L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams