← Search

Diane Barnard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Buford, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 31W–22L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history53 matches
W
2026-06-21 · EE Robinson (Leslie Hooper)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Bailey
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · EE Robinson (Leslie Hooper)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Hooper
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-6
L
2025-11-19 · NEGTA/Sandy McQueen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Painter
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-10-06 · NEGTA/Sandy McQueen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Beasley
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-4
W
2025-07-28 · Alberta Banks-McQueen · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ally Adler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-21 · Alberta Banks-McQueen · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandy McQueen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-07 · Alberta Banks-McQueen · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Meier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-06-16 · Alberta Banks-McQueen · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ally Adler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-12-14 · Mill Creek HS (Leslie Hooper)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shayna Aspinwall
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-11-16 · Mill Creek HS (Leslie Hooper)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Rowe
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-07-14 · Mill Creek High School (Leslie Hooper)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Zaro
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-23 · Mill Creek High School (Leslie Hooper)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Zaro
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
54.8%
23W–19L · 54.4% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 67.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#1 Singles
15%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova