← Search

Dave VanHattum

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 2W–22L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history24 matches
L
2025-05-22 · Fermstad: Top 40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Terhaar
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-15 · Fermstad: Top 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alonzo Hwang
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-25 · Fermstad: LakeVillains · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eddie Lee
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-18 · Fermstad: LakeVillains · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alejandro Trevino
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-06-04 · Fermstad: LakeVillains · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alejandro Trevino
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-05-14 · Fermstad: LakeVillains · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lucas Tesh
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-05-07 · Fermstad: LakeVillains · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Fermstad
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-07-11 · Seats- Good Guys · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Bucher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-27 · Seats- Good Guys · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Bucher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2022-06-06 · Seats- Good Guys · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Bucher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-7
L
2022-05-23 · Seats- Good Guys · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Hill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-03-14 · Seats- Good Guys · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Terhaar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–10L · 37.4% of games
8.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer