← Search

Pip Sanders

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stanford, CA
— year-end
18 matches · 4W–14L · seasons 2019–2021
Match history18 matches
L
2020-02-19 · HOLBROOK PK 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Mosier
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2020-02-08 · STANFORD-CRA 40AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthea Kingsley
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-01-25 · STANFORD-CRA 40AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Freedman
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2019-11-20 · STANFORD-CRA CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Zhang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2019-11-16 · STANFORD-CRA CW5.5A · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Shannon Wolfe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2019-11-09 · STANFORD-CRA CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Hwang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2019-11-02 · STANFORD-CRA CW6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Hwang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2019-10-27 · STANFORD-CRA CW5.5A · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Deborah Menet Landi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2019-10-12 · STANFORD-CRA CW6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Dodd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2019-10-05 · STANFORD-CRA CW5.5A · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Debra Hummel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2019-04-27 · STANFORD-CRA 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthea Kingsley
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2019-04-20 · STANFORD-CRA 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Bollyky
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
Teams6 teams · 2019–2020
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–10L · 34.8% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova