← Search

Dawn Wildfeuer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 67W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history122 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Colby championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-24 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Kelm championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-10-21 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-10-18 · Simply Smashing Chalmers RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-20 · Simply Smashing Chalmers RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-12 · 2026 Chambers/Singh RAC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Singh mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-12 · 2026 Chambers/Singh RAC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ashkan Paykar mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Cerhan championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-22 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-22 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Kelm championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 57% of games
3.5
51.3%
40W–38L · 52.4% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert