← Search

Peter Beltramo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Amherst, MA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 10W–5L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history15 matches
W
2026-03-07 · BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scotia Roopnarine
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 7-6
L
2025-10-04 · BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scotia Roopnarine
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2024-05-05 · BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/Palmer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pete Westover
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2024-04-06 · BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/Palmer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Hernandez
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-02-24 · BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/Palmer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nianqiang Wu
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-01-28 · BAY:Double Agents 18+:Scott/Mason · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacqueline Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2023-10-22 · BAY:Double Agents 18+:Scott/Mason · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phoebe Gelbard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 5-2
W
2023-09-24 · BAY:Double Agents 18+:Scott/Mason · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phoebe Gelbard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 3-1
L
2023-05-06 · BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/Ferriter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nianqiang Wu
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-02-11 · BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/Ferriter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Lewis
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2022-04-24 · BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/Ferriter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ricardo Metz
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 6-2
L
2022-03-20 · BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/Ferriter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ricardo Metz
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 50.9% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#1 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova