← Search

Emma Cioffi

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Staten Island, NY
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 7W–6L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history13 matches
L
2026-10-11 · Triple Advantage · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Skye Victor
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Triple Advantage · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alison Isaac
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-05-20 · Glick/Stewart · #1 Doubles · with Elena Blanina
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-13 · Glick/Stewart · #2 Doubles · with Kathy Wang
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-05-08 · Bindler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Crissianne Kintanar
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2025-04-29 · Glick/Stewart · #2 Doubles · with Kathy Wang
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-04-21 · Glick/Stewart · #1 Doubles · with Lindsey Hodge
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-04-17 · Bindler · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Cosmo Amabile mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-04-09 · Bindler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anastasiya Shcherbakova
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-26 · Glick · #1 Doubles · with Adrienne Haynes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-06-18 · Glick · #1 Doubles · with Jane Stewart
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-06-12 · Glick · #1 Doubles · with Adrienne Haynes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 77% of the time
#1 Doubles
77%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova