← Search

Chrissa Matthews

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Aiken, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
289 matches · 195W–94L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history289 matches
W
2026-10-20 · Odell/Rogerson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julea Hovey
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-23 · Odell Weeks/Uhle · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keisha Uhle
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-22 · GATA/40/COMBO/FUCHS/PETRUSKA/SLV · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Fuchs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-09-17 · Odell Weeks/Uhle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Pope
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-15 · Odell/Rogerson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julea Hovey
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-08 · Odell/Rogerson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julea Hovey
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · GATA/40/COMBO/FUCHS/PETRUSKA/SLV · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Kaeding
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-29 · Odell Rogerson Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon McKool
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · Odell Weeks/Uhle · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keisha Uhle
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Odell Rogerson Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Homan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · GATA/40/COMBO/FUCHS/PETRUSKA/SLV · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Peterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · Odell Rogerson Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams102 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 53.6% of games
3.5
90.9%
40W–4L · 63.4% of games
4.0
60.6%
94W–61L · 55.7% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.6% of games
7.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 67% of games
7.5
70.4%
38W–16L · 60.2% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
79 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe