← Search

Joe Kenis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lakeway, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 19W–40L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history59 matches
L
2026-03-14 · Oldies but Goodies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Boyd
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · Oldies but Goodies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Rinke
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-22 · Oldies but Goodies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Boyd
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-07 · Oldies but Goodies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Felder
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-01-31 · Oldies but Goodies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Evans
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Piotr Wojcik
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Collier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Boyd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Piotr Wojcik
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Collier
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Murch
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-03-03 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Embrey
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
38.6%
17W–27L · 45.9% of games
8.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal