← Search

Kirsten Arendes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
The Woodlands, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 42W–46L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history88 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Forest Oaks - Chicks with Sticks · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Monica Roberts
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-18 · Forest Oaks - Chicks with Sticks · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Keiko Chevray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · Forest Oaks - Chicks with Sticks · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gabriella Guntur
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-22 · Forest Oaks - Chicks with Sticks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leigh Robinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · Spearman-Sets and The Woods-Memorial NW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Rook championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-15 · Spearman-Sets and The Woods-Memorial NW · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Khim
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-04-11 · Forest Oaks · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Wassell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-08 · Forest Oaks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Leavenworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-06 · Forest Oaks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Flores mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Forest Oaks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chad Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-20 · Spearman-Sets and The Woods-Memorial NW · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elsa Piekielniak
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-04 · Spearman-Silverados-Memorial Northwest · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Hensley
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.7% of games
3.5
44.4%
16W–20L · 46.5% of games
4.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 44.8% of games
7.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 64.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
13 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer